On 7 July 2013 11:07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/07/13 01:03, sebb wrote: > > <snip> > > >> Note that 0.9 takes much very longer than 0.8 if there are long files >> that don't contain the license near the start. >> This is because 0.9 has several extra scanners, all of which are very >> inefficient on such files. >> 0.8 only had one such scanner. >> >> I've fixed these issues in SVN. > > > :-) > > >> So maybe worth holding off until 0.91 (or whatever) can be released. > > > Should we sort out the binary assembly before cutting a new release or just > rush out what's in trunk...?
I think we should fix the binary assembly; should not be too difficult. > >> Anyone that wants 0.9 has probably already fetched it from Maven ... > > > True > > Probably worthwhile doing a limited announcement (creadur website and so on) The creadur RAT site includes download links to 0.9 but is headed 0.9-SNAPSHOT. > Robert
