Yeah there's something weird with the mailing system. stephen
On 5/16/14 4:31 PM, "Dligach, Dmitriy" <[email protected]> wrote: >WeirdŠ I sent this email days ago. > >Dima > > > > >On May 16, 2014, at 16:16, Dligach, Dmitriy ><[email protected]> wrote: > >> Probably a good idea. Would this new type be related to >>IdentifiedAnnotation? Its super type? >> >> Dima >> >> >> >> >> On May 15, 2014, at 3:02, Miller, Timothy >><[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> What do people think about taking the "markable" types out of the >>> coreference project and adding them to the standard type system? This >>>is >>> a pretty standard concept in coreference that doesn't really have a >>> great natural representation in the current type system -- it >>> encompasses IdentifiedAnnotations as well as pronouns ("It", "him", >>> "her") and some determiners ("this"). >>> >>> The drawback I can see is that it is probably not something anyone >>>would >>> want extracted -- ultimately you want the actual coref pairs or chains. >>> But it is useful for things like representing gold standard input or >>> splitting coreference resolution into separate markable recognition and >>> relation classification steps. >>> >>> Tim >>> >> >
