Hmm, we can check what the current co reference Markable type extends. But my guess is Annotation for the pronoun use case?- A pronoun could be a Markable, but not necessarily an IdentitfiedAnnotation?
Sent from my iPhone > On May 16, 2014, at 5:16 PM, "Dligach, Dmitriy" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Probably a good idea. Would this new type be related to IdentifiedAnnotation? > Its super type? > > Dima > > > > >> On May 15, 2014, at 3:02, Miller, Timothy >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What do people think about taking the "markable" types out of the >> coreference project and adding them to the standard type system? This is >> a pretty standard concept in coreference that doesn't really have a >> great natural representation in the current type system -- it >> encompasses IdentifiedAnnotations as well as pronouns ("It", "him", >> "her") and some determiners ("this"). >> >> The drawback I can see is that it is probably not something anyone would >> want extracted -- ultimately you want the actual coref pairs or chains. >> But it is useful for things like representing gold standard input or >> splitting coreference resolution into separate markable recognition and >> relation classification steps. >> >> Tim >
