Probably a good idea. Would this new type be related to IdentifiedAnnotation? Its super type?
Dima On May 15, 2014, at 3:02, Miller, Timothy <[email protected]> wrote: > What do people think about taking the "markable" types out of the > coreference project and adding them to the standard type system? This is > a pretty standard concept in coreference that doesn't really have a > great natural representation in the current type system -- it > encompasses IdentifiedAnnotations as well as pronouns ("It", "him", > "her") and some determiners ("this"). > > The drawback I can see is that it is probably not something anyone would > want extracted -- ultimately you want the actual coref pairs or chains. > But it is useful for things like representing gold standard input or > splitting coreference resolution into separate markable recognition and > relation classification steps. > > Tim >
