[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15812670#comment-15812670
]
Mike Drob commented on CURATOR-200:
-----------------------------------
Ah! I misread the diff and see this now. Thank you for clarifying. Big +1 to
merge this!
> Proposal: Remove references to guava library from public APIs
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CURATOR-200
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-200
> Project: Apache Curator
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Framework
> Reporter: Mike Drob
> Assignee: Jordan Zimmerman
> Fix For: 3.3.0, 2.12.0
>
>
> There was a good discussion on the mailing list:
> http://curator.markmail.org/thread/yjete2ozm32jmz5u
> The critical portion copied here:
> {quote}
> The problem classes that I have found are:
> * curator-framework: org.apache.curator.framework.listen.ListenerContainer :
> method forEach takes a parameter of type com.google.common.base.Function
> * curator-framework:
> org.apache.curator.framework.api.transaction.CuratorTransactionResult :
> method ofTypeAndPath returns com.google.common.base.Predicate
> * curator-x-discovery-server:
> org.apache.curator.x.discovery.server.contexts.GenericDiscoveryContext :
> constructor takes param of type com.google.common.reflect.TypeToken
> * curator-x-discovery: org.apache.curator.x.discovery.InstanceFilter :
> inherits from com.google.common.base.Predicate
> {quote}
> In the ensuing discussion, it sounded like we'd need to get started on an
> implementation before we had enough information to determine whether the
> changes are too intrusive or not.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
