On Tue March 10 2009 3:28:45 pm Benson Margulies wrote: > Given the msv problems I've run into, the woodstox validation code > doesn't belong in 2.2. > > My plan is: > > 1) commit current state, which is structurally relevant. > 2) branch to sandbox. > 3) delete the wstx-msv-validator module from the trunk. > 4) extend the modularity fixes to the write side of the universe. > 5) return to this topic for 2.2.x. Turning it on once the backend > works can't be a giant problem.
That works for me. :-) Thanks! -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
