On Tue March 10 2009 9:33:14 pm Benson Margulies wrote: > I thought of a way to avoid branching and deleting, I've arranged for > the bus extension not to register. > > And KK just made me a 'committer' on msv.
That's really cool. > And said that the 'nuclear' clause was a complete mistake. Nice. That will teach him to copy/paste without reading completely. :-) Dan > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue March 10 2009 3:28:45 pm Benson Margulies wrote: > >> Given the msv problems I've run into, the woodstox validation code > >> doesn't belong in 2.2. > >> > >> My plan is: > >> > >> 1) commit current state, which is structurally relevant. > >> 2) branch to sandbox. > >> 3) delete the wstx-msv-validator module from the trunk. > >> 4) extend the modularity fixes to the write side of the universe. > >> 5) return to this topic for 2.2.x. Turning it on once the backend > >> works can't be a giant problem. > > > > That works for me. :-) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > [email protected] > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
