I thought of a way to avoid branching and deleting, I've arranged for the bus extension not to register.
And KK just made me a 'committer' on msv. And said that the 'nuclear' clause was a complete mistake. On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue March 10 2009 3:28:45 pm Benson Margulies wrote: >> Given the msv problems I've run into, the woodstox validation code >> doesn't belong in 2.2. >> >> My plan is: >> >> 1) commit current state, which is structurally relevant. >> 2) branch to sandbox. >> 3) delete the wstx-msv-validator module from the trunk. >> 4) extend the modularity fixes to the write side of the universe. >> 5) return to this topic for 2.2.x. Turning it on once the backend >> works can't be a giant problem. > > That works for me. :-) > > Thanks! > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
