Same conclusion, it shouldn't be optional/provided.
Thanks for spotting it.
JDA> That's what I'm asking basically. If you look at
JDA> don't believe it should be provided/optional.
JDA> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 12:49 PM Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com>
>> Why should be optional ?
>> On 04/02/18 14:00, John D. Ament wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > As far as I can tell, the dependency on reactive streams isn't optional
>> > the project reactor module. I'm wondering, was this just a typo, or am I
>> > missing something?
>> > John