The same though applies to the client code - it makes no sense on the server side, so may be it is just simpler to make that dep non-optional for the consistency purpose, up to you guys...

On 04/02/18 18:57, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
You've already concluded it is a bug...

I recall now, I made it optional because that code makes no sense on the client side only, while the reactive streams api is also pulled from the reactor dep...

Cheers, Sergey
On 04/02/18 18:12, Andriy Redko wrote:
Same conclusion, it shouldn't be optional/provided.
Thanks for spotting it.

Best Regards,
     Andriy Redko

JDA> That's what I'm asking basically.  If you look at
JDA> don't believe it should be provided/optional.

JDA> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 12:49 PM Sergey Beryozkin <>
JDA> wrote:

Why should be optional ?

On 04/02/18 14:00, John D. Ament wrote:

As far as I can tell, the dependency on reactive streams isn't optional
the project reactor module.  I'm wondering, was this just a typo, or am I
missing something?


Reply via email to