The same though applies to the client code - it makes no sense on the
server side, so may be it is just simpler to make that dep non-optional
for the consistency purpose, up to you guys...
On 04/02/18 18:57, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
You've already concluded it is a bug...
I recall now, I made it optional because that code makes no sense on the
client side only, while the reactive streams api is also pulled from the
On 04/02/18 18:12, Andriy Redko wrote:
Same conclusion, it shouldn't be optional/provided.
Thanks for spotting it.
JDA> That's what I'm asking basically. If you look at
JDA> don't believe it should be provided/optional.
JDA> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 12:49 PM Sergey Beryozkin
Why should be optional ?
On 04/02/18 14:00, John D. Ament wrote:
As far as I can tell, the dependency on reactive streams isn't
the project reactor module. I'm wondering, was this just a typo,
or am I