Thanks a lot, Colm! > I've called a vote on Santuario today, so I'll try to release and get > a WSS4J vote started by end of week.
> Colm. > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 11:09 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Colm, >> I think it would be good to have a release soon-ish, but by and large, I >> don't think >> we have hard deadline for it, please feel free to proceed as per your >> judgement. >> Thank you. >> Best Regards, >> Andriy Redko >>> Sorry it turns out I'll need to get Santuario 3.0.4 out first. Do I >>> have time to do this and WSS4J before the next CXF release? >>> Colm. >>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 3:28 PM Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Thanks Colm! >>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:18 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Yes, I'll call a vote today on WSS4J 3.0.3. >>>>> Colm. >>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 2:28 PM Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> +1 to release Apache CXF 4.0.4 >>>>>> @Colm O hEigeartaigh Any chance we could have a WSS4J 3.0.3 release soon? >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> Freeman >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:15 AM Jiri Ondrusek <jondr...@redhat.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> just for your information, the PR >>>>>>> (https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1660) >>>>>>> requires version of wss4f to be 3.0.3 (to contain >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-709) >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Jiri >>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:53 AM Peter Palaga <ppal...@redhat.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Thanks, great to hear that, Andriy. >>>>>>>> It would be great if we could get >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1660 merged in some form before the >>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>> The main motivation is to be able to run CXF on FIPS-enabled systems. >>>>>>>> If >>>>>>>> the customized algo suite, that the PR proposes, is questionable, I'd >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> also fine with introducing a couple of new suites with fixed >>>>>>>> non-standard names, like already done in the past for fixing CVEs. It >>>>>>>> would be nice to hear other community members' thoughts. >>>>>>>> Thanks again, >>>>>>>> -- Peter >>>>>>>> On 13/02/2024 02:35, Andriy Redko wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for reminding, I belive we are long overdue on that, >>>>>>>>> @Dan, >>>>>>>> @Colm >>>>>>>>> may need your help please preparing the next release train (or any >>>>>>>> objection folks)? >>>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>> Andriy Redko >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> we are preparing Quarkus CXF to release it for Quarkus 3.8 which is >>>>>>>> going to be a LTS (Long Term Support) release. >>>>>>>>>> I wonder whether we could count on getting CXF 4.0.4 by February 21st >>>>>>>> to be able to use it in that release? >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> -- Peter >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Jiri Ondrusek <jondr...@redhat.com> >>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer >>>>>>> Red Hat Fuse
