Thanks for releasing Santuario and WSS4J Colm! I think we shall release CXF 4.0.4 now.
@Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> Could you please help release CXF 4.0.4? Thanks so much! Freeman On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 5:42 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> wrote: > I've called a vote on Santuario today, so I'll try to release and get > a WSS4J vote started by end of week. > > Colm. > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 11:09 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Colm, > > > > I think it would be good to have a release soon-ish, but by and large, I > don't think > > we have hard deadline for it, please feel free to proceed as per your > judgement. > > Thank you. > > > > Best Regards, > > Andriy Redko > > > > > Sorry it turns out I'll need to get Santuario 3.0.4 out first. Do I > > > have time to do this and WSS4J before the next CXF release? > > > > > Colm. > > > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 3:28 PM Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> Thanks Colm! > > >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:18 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh < > cohei...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>> Yes, I'll call a vote today on WSS4J 3.0.3. > > >>> Colm. > > >>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 2:28 PM Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>>> +1 to release Apache CXF 4.0.4 > > >>>> @Colm O hEigeartaigh Any chance we could have a WSS4J 3.0.3 release > soon? > > >>>> Thanks! > > >>>> Freeman > > >>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:15 AM Jiri Ondrusek <jondr...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> just for your information, the PR ( > https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1660) > > >>>>> requires version of wss4f to be 3.0.3 (to contain > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-709) > > >>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>> Jiri > > >>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:53 AM Peter Palaga <ppal...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > >>>>>> Thanks, great to hear that, Andriy. > > > > >>>>>> It would be great if we could get > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1660 merged in some form > before the > > >>>>>> release. > > >>>>>> The main motivation is to be able to run CXF on FIPS-enabled > systems. If > > >>>>>> the customized algo suite, that the PR proposes, is questionable, > I'd be > > >>>>>> also fine with introducing a couple of new suites with fixed > > >>>>>> non-standard names, like already done in the past for fixing > CVEs. It > > >>>>>> would be nice to hear other community members' thoughts. > > >>>>>> Thanks again, > > >>>>>> -- Peter > > >>>>>> On 13/02/2024 02:35, Andriy Redko wrote: > > >>>>>>> Hi Peter, > > >>>>>>> Thanks a lot for reminding, I belive we are long overdue on > that, @Dan, > > >>>>>> @Colm > > >>>>>>> may need your help please preparing the next release train (or > any > > >>>>>> objection folks)? > > >>>>>>> Thank you! > > >>>>>>> Best Regards, > > >>>>>>> Andriy Redko > > >>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>> we are preparing Quarkus CXF to release it for Quarkus 3.8 > which is > > >>>>>> going to be a LTS (Long Term Support) release. > > >>>>>>>> I wonder whether we could count on getting CXF 4.0.4 by > February 21st > > >>>>>> to be able to use it in that release? > > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>> -- Peter > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Jiri Ondrusek <jondr...@redhat.com> > > >>>>> Senior Software Engineer > > >>>>> Red Hat Fuse > > >
