+1, thanks Freeman! Folks, I will be off till next Friday (March, 8th),
but I should have access to email, most of the day. Sorry about that.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
Wednesday, February 28, 2024, 12:03:35 PM, you wrote:
> Thanks for releasing Santuario and WSS4J Colm!
> I think we shall release CXF 4.0.4 now.
> @Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> Could you please help release CXF 4.0.4?
> Thanks so much!
> Freeman
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 5:42 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>> I've called a vote on Santuario today, so I'll try to release and get
>> a WSS4J vote started by end of week.
>> Colm.
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 11:09 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Colm,
>>> I think it would be good to have a release soon-ish, but by and large, I
>> don't think
>>> we have hard deadline for it, please feel free to proceed as per your
>> judgement.
>>> Thank you.
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Andriy Redko
>>>> Sorry it turns out I'll need to get Santuario 3.0.4 out first. Do I
>>>> have time to do this and WSS4J before the next CXF release?
>>>> Colm.
>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 3:28 PM Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Colm!
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:18 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh <
cohei...@apache.org>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Yes, I'll call a vote today on WSS4J 3.0.3.
>>>>>> Colm.
>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 2:28 PM Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>> +1 to release Apache CXF 4.0.4
>>>>>>> @Colm O hEigeartaigh Any chance we could have a WSS4J 3.0.3 release
>> soon?
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>> Freeman
>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:15 AM Jiri Ondrusek <jondr...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> just for your information, the PR (
>> https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1660)
>>>>>>>> requires version of wss4f to be 3.0.3 (to contain
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-709)
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Jiri
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:53 AM Peter Palaga <ppal...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Thanks, great to hear that, Andriy.
>>>>>>>>> It would be great if we could get
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1660 merged in some form
>> before the
>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>> The main motivation is to be able to run CXF on FIPS-enabled
>> systems. If
>>>>>>>>> the customized algo suite, that the PR proposes, is questionable,
>> I'd be
>>>>>>>>> also fine with introducing a couple of new suites with fixed
>>>>>>>>> non-standard names, like already done in the past for fixing
>> CVEs. It
>>>>>>>>> would be nice to hear other community members' thoughts.
>>>>>>>>> Thanks again,
>>>>>>>>> -- Peter
>>>>>>>>> On 13/02/2024 02:35, Andriy Redko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for reminding, I belive we are long overdue on
>> that, @Dan,
>>>>>>>>> @Colm
>>>>>>>>>> may need your help please preparing the next release train (or
>> any
>>>>>>>>> objection folks)?
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Andriy Redko
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> we are preparing Quarkus CXF to release it for Quarkus 3.8
>> which is
>>>>>>>>> going to be a LTS (Long Term Support) release.
>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder whether we could count on getting CXF 4.0.4 by
>> February 21st
>>>>>>>>> to be able to use it in that release?
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> -- Peter
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jiri Ondrusek <jondr...@redhat.com>
>>>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>>>>>> Red Hat Fuse
