Thank you Andy,. I've had the same problem as Andrew with the same tests failing while others never finished.
``` test supported::should_execute_sql_show_multiple_times::case_3_standalone_state ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_explain_analyze_query::case_2_remote ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_sql_show_multiple_times::case_1_standalone ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_sql_show_multiple_times::case_2_remote ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_sql_show_with_url_table::case_2_remote ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_sql_write::case_1_standalone ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_sql_write::case_2_remote ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_sql_write_read_roundtrip::case_4_remote_state ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_sql_show_with_url_table::case_1_standalone ... ok test supported::should_execute_sql_collect_from_arrow_file::case_2_remote ... FAILED test supported::should_support_hash_join_when_opted_in::case_2_remote ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_sql_show_multiple_times::case_4_remote_state ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_sql_write_read_roundtrip::case_3_standalone_state ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_sql_write_read_roundtrip::case_1_standalone ... FAILED test supported::should_explain_executed_plan::case_2_remote ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_sql_write_read_roundtrip::case_2_remote ... FAILED test supported::should_force_local_read_with_flight::case_1_standalone ... FAILED test supported::should_explain_executed_plan::case_1_standalone ... FAILED test supported::should_force_client_pull::case_1_standalone ... FAILED test supported::should_force_client_pull::case_2_remote ... FAILED test supported::should_execute_explain_analyze_query::case_1_standalone has been running for over 60 seconds test supported::should_execute_sql_collect_from_arrow_file::case_1_standalone has been running for over 60 seconds test supported::should_execute_sql_create_external_table::case_2_remote has been running for over 60 seconds ``` On Sun, 4 Oct 2026 at 05:43, Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> wrote: > +0 > > I ran the verification scripts on Mac M3 Max and several of the tests > didn't finish (list below) > > This is probably fine, but I wanted to raise it to your attention before > a +1 vote > > Thank you Andy > > Andrew > > > test supported::should_force_client_pull::case_1_standalone has been > running for over 60 seconds > test supported::should_force_client_pull::case_2_remote has been running > for over 60 seconds > test supported::should_force_local_read::case_1_standalone has been running > for over 60 seconds > test supported::should_force_local_read::case_2_remote has been running for > over 60 seconds > test supported::should_force_local_read_with_flight::case_2_remote has been > running for over 60 seconds > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2026 at 4:58 AM Marko Milenković <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks Andy! > > -- > > Marko Milenković > > > > > On 3 Oct 2026, at 23:31, L. C. Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Verified on M4 Mac. > > > > > > Thanks Andy. > > > > > > > > >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2026 at 9:02 AM Andy Grove <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I would like to propose a release of Apache DataFusion Ballista > version > > >> 55.0.0. > > >> > > >> This release candidate is based on commit: > > >> d5379965528955a4afc5f41bac0c8c409de68a7d [1] > > >> The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2]. > > >> The changelog is located at [3]. > > >> > > >> The Python client is not part of this release. It is released > > separately, > > >> with > > >> its own vote, once datafusion-python has published a matching release. > > >> > > >> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, > > and > > >> vote > > >> on the release. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > >> > > >> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the > > community > > >> are > > >> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > >> > > >> The standard verification procedure is documented at > > >> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verifying-release-candidates > > >> . > > >> > > >> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache DataFusion Ballista 55.0.0 > > >> [ ] +0 > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache DataFusion Ballista 55.0.0 > > because... > > >> > > >> Here is my vote: +1 > > >> > > >> [1]: > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/tree/d5379965528955a4afc5f41bac0c8c409de68a7d > > >> [2]: > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/datafusion/apache-datafusion-ballista-55.0.0-rc1 > > >> [3]: > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/blob/d5379965528955a4afc5f41bac0c8c409de68a7d/docs/source/changelog/55.0.0.md > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
