+1 (non-binding) after setting the file handle limit.
Thank you

On Sun, Oct 4, 2026 at 11:49 AM Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> I set my file handle limit to 10000  per Marko's suggestion:
>
> ulimit -n 10000
>
> And now the verification successfully passes on my Mac M3
>
> Thank you everyone
>
> Andrew
>
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2026 at 1:13 PM Marko Milenković <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Andrew and Bhargava, I've managed to reproduce the issue on a
> > different machine and I believe it's caused by ulimit. Changing ulimit -n
> > 2048 makes verifications pass
> >
> > Whenever you get chance please check
> >
> > --
> > Marko Milenković
> >
> > > On 4 Oct 2026, at 22:18, Bhargava Vadlamani <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you Andy,. I've had the same problem as Andrew with the same
> tests
> > > failing while others never finished.
> > >
> > > ```
> > > test
> > >
> >
> supported::should_execute_sql_show_multiple_times::case_3_standalone_state
> > > ... FAILED
> > > test supported::should_execute_explain_analyze_query::case_2_remote ...
> > > FAILED
> > > test
> supported::should_execute_sql_show_multiple_times::case_1_standalone
> > > ... FAILED
> > > test supported::should_execute_sql_show_multiple_times::case_2_remote
> ...
> > > FAILED
> > > test supported::should_execute_sql_show_with_url_table::case_2_remote
> ...
> > > FAILED
> > > test supported::should_execute_sql_write::case_1_standalone ... FAILED
> > > test supported::should_execute_sql_write::case_2_remote ... FAILED
> > > test
> > > supported::should_execute_sql_write_read_roundtrip::case_4_remote_state
> > ...
> > > FAILED
> > > test
> supported::should_execute_sql_show_with_url_table::case_1_standalone
> > > ... ok
> > > test
> supported::should_execute_sql_collect_from_arrow_file::case_2_remote
> > > ... FAILED
> > > test supported::should_support_hash_join_when_opted_in::case_2_remote
> ...
> > > FAILED
> > > test
> > supported::should_execute_sql_show_multiple_times::case_4_remote_state
> > > ... FAILED
> > > test
> > >
> >
> supported::should_execute_sql_write_read_roundtrip::case_3_standalone_state
> > > ... FAILED
> > > test
> > supported::should_execute_sql_write_read_roundtrip::case_1_standalone
> > > ... FAILED
> > > test supported::should_explain_executed_plan::case_2_remote ... FAILED
> > > test supported::should_execute_sql_write_read_roundtrip::case_2_remote
> > ...
> > > FAILED
> > > test supported::should_force_local_read_with_flight::case_1_standalone
> > ...
> > > FAILED
> > > test supported::should_explain_executed_plan::case_1_standalone ...
> > FAILED
> > > test supported::should_force_client_pull::case_1_standalone ... FAILED
> > > test supported::should_force_client_pull::case_2_remote ... FAILED
> > > test supported::should_execute_explain_analyze_query::case_1_standalone
> > has
> > > been running for over 60 seconds
> > > test
> > >
> supported::should_execute_sql_collect_from_arrow_file::case_1_standalone
> > > has been running for over 60 seconds
> > > test supported::should_execute_sql_create_external_table::case_2_remote
> > has
> > > been running for over 60 seconds
> > > ```
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Sun, 4 Oct 2026 at 05:43, Andrew Lamb <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> +0
> > >>
> > >> I ran the verification scripts on Mac M3 Max and several of the tests
> > >> didn't finish (list below)
> > >>
> > >> This is probably fine, but I wanted to raise it to your attention
> before
> > >> a +1 vote
> > >>
> > >> Thank you Andy
> > >>
> > >> Andrew
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> test supported::should_force_client_pull::case_1_standalone has been
> > >> running for over 60 seconds
> > >> test supported::should_force_client_pull::case_2_remote has been
> running
> > >> for over 60 seconds
> > >> test supported::should_force_local_read::case_1_standalone has been
> > running
> > >> for over 60 seconds
> > >> test supported::should_force_local_read::case_2_remote has been
> running
> > for
> > >> over 60 seconds
> > >> test supported::should_force_local_read_with_flight::case_2_remote has
> > been
> > >> running for over 60 seconds
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2026 at 4:58 AM Marko Milenković <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks Andy!
> > >>> --
> > >>> Marko Milenković
> > >>>
> > >>>> On 3 Oct 2026, at 23:31, L. C. Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Verified on M4 Mac.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks Andy.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2026 at 9:02 AM Andy Grove <[email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I would like to propose a release of Apache DataFusion Ballista
> > >> version
> > >>>>> 55.0.0.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This release candidate is based on commit:
> > >>>>> d5379965528955a4afc5f41bac0c8c409de68a7d [1]
> > >>>>> The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2].
> > >>>>> The changelog is located at [3].
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The Python client is not part of this release. It is released
> > >>> separately,
> > >>>>> with
> > >>>>> its own vote, once datafusion-python has published a matching
> > release.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit
> tests,
> > >>> and
> > >>>>> vote
> > >>>>> on the release. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the
> > >>> community
> > >>>>> are
> > >>>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The standard verification procedure is documented at
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verifying-release-candidates
> > >>>>> .
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache DataFusion Ballista 55.0.0
> > >>>>> [ ] +0
> > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache DataFusion Ballista 55.0.0
> > >>> because...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Here is my vote: +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [1]:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/tree/d5379965528955a4afc5f41bac0c8c409de68a7d
> > >>>>> [2]:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/datafusion/apache-datafusion-ballista-55.0.0-rc1
> > >>>>> [3]:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/blob/d5379965528955a4afc5f41bac0c8c409de68a7d/docs/source/changelog/55.0.0.md
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to