Thanks Andrew and Bhargava, I've managed to reproduce the issue on a different machine and I believe it's caused by ulimit. Changing ulimit -n 2048 makes verifications pass
Whenever you get chance please check -- Marko Milenković > On 4 Oct 2026, at 22:18, Bhargava Vadlamani <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you Andy,. I've had the same problem as Andrew with the same tests > failing while others never finished. > > ``` > test > supported::should_execute_sql_show_multiple_times::case_3_standalone_state > ... FAILED > test supported::should_execute_explain_analyze_query::case_2_remote ... > FAILED > test supported::should_execute_sql_show_multiple_times::case_1_standalone > ... FAILED > test supported::should_execute_sql_show_multiple_times::case_2_remote ... > FAILED > test supported::should_execute_sql_show_with_url_table::case_2_remote ... > FAILED > test supported::should_execute_sql_write::case_1_standalone ... FAILED > test supported::should_execute_sql_write::case_2_remote ... FAILED > test > supported::should_execute_sql_write_read_roundtrip::case_4_remote_state ... > FAILED > test supported::should_execute_sql_show_with_url_table::case_1_standalone > ... ok > test supported::should_execute_sql_collect_from_arrow_file::case_2_remote > ... FAILED > test supported::should_support_hash_join_when_opted_in::case_2_remote ... > FAILED > test supported::should_execute_sql_show_multiple_times::case_4_remote_state > ... FAILED > test > supported::should_execute_sql_write_read_roundtrip::case_3_standalone_state > ... FAILED > test supported::should_execute_sql_write_read_roundtrip::case_1_standalone > ... FAILED > test supported::should_explain_executed_plan::case_2_remote ... FAILED > test supported::should_execute_sql_write_read_roundtrip::case_2_remote ... > FAILED > test supported::should_force_local_read_with_flight::case_1_standalone ... > FAILED > test supported::should_explain_executed_plan::case_1_standalone ... FAILED > test supported::should_force_client_pull::case_1_standalone ... FAILED > test supported::should_force_client_pull::case_2_remote ... FAILED > test supported::should_execute_explain_analyze_query::case_1_standalone has > been running for over 60 seconds > test > supported::should_execute_sql_collect_from_arrow_file::case_1_standalone > has been running for over 60 seconds > test supported::should_execute_sql_create_external_table::case_2_remote has > been running for over 60 seconds > ``` > > >> On Sun, 4 Oct 2026 at 05:43, Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +0 >> >> I ran the verification scripts on Mac M3 Max and several of the tests >> didn't finish (list below) >> >> This is probably fine, but I wanted to raise it to your attention before >> a +1 vote >> >> Thank you Andy >> >> Andrew >> >> >> test supported::should_force_client_pull::case_1_standalone has been >> running for over 60 seconds >> test supported::should_force_client_pull::case_2_remote has been running >> for over 60 seconds >> test supported::should_force_local_read::case_1_standalone has been running >> for over 60 seconds >> test supported::should_force_local_read::case_2_remote has been running for >> over 60 seconds >> test supported::should_force_local_read_with_flight::case_2_remote has been >> running for over 60 seconds >> >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2026 at 4:58 AM Marko Milenković <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Thanks Andy! >>> -- >>> Marko Milenković >>> >>>> On 3 Oct 2026, at 23:31, L. C. Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> Verified on M4 Mac. >>>> >>>> Thanks Andy. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2026 at 9:02 AM Andy Grove <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I would like to propose a release of Apache DataFusion Ballista >> version >>>>> 55.0.0. >>>>> >>>>> This release candidate is based on commit: >>>>> d5379965528955a4afc5f41bac0c8c409de68a7d [1] >>>>> The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2]. >>>>> The changelog is located at [3]. >>>>> >>>>> The Python client is not part of this release. It is released >>> separately, >>>>> with >>>>> its own vote, once datafusion-python has published a matching release. >>>>> >>>>> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, >>> and >>>>> vote >>>>> on the release. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>> >>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the >>> community >>>>> are >>>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". >>>>> >>>>> The standard verification procedure is documented at >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verifying-release-candidates >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache DataFusion Ballista 55.0.0 >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache DataFusion Ballista 55.0.0 >>> because... >>>>> >>>>> Here is my vote: +1 >>>>> >>>>> [1]: >>>>> >>> >> https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/tree/d5379965528955a4afc5f41bac0c8c409de68a7d >>>>> [2]: >>>>> >>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/datafusion/apache-datafusion-ballista-55.0.0-rc1 >>>>> [3]: >>>>> >>> >> https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/blob/d5379965528955a4afc5f41bac0c8c409de68a7d/docs/source/changelog/55.0.0.md >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
