Werner, you are really pushing by buttons here. Remember this email when I resigned from DeviceMap:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/devicemap-dev/201504.mbox/%3CCAKuYhJsPzCQsS7YrEbsRtFDbGcDsC5zEozakQwJKrOcwZrnCow%40mail.gmail.com%3E That agreement I keep on mentioning was the reason I decided to stay here and work on 2.0. Just a reminder that the agreement was that me and you would work on different parts of this project and that we stay out of each others way. So please do me a favor stop engaging on my work. Im so very close to leaving this project and moving my work somewhere else where I can work without your constant comments, interruptions, and attacks. This has been going on for 2 years. You are like a never ending nightmare... On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess in that early stage it seems OK. Compared to a JSR it probably is > no further than EDR stage right now. > > Where say you have a particular state of the data set and either Java or JS > client, tagging them in a consistent way could make most sense. That was > the main reason for any tags other than /release you'd find. > Especially when there's something to demonstrate it is often a good idea. > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Reza Naghibi <r...@naghibi.com> wrote: > > > While your point is valid, it doesn't change the fact that a breaking > > change is being introduced into the specification. > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > That's why occasional snapshots would also be nice here, even if > they're > > > like javascript-client-2.0-alpha ;-) > > > > > > When ApacheCon is closer I'll have a look, but not yet. > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Reza Naghibi <re...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Small chance... but just incase someone is working or looking at the > > > > attribute spec, its going to change. Im currently putting together > the > > > > javascript client [1] and given that JSON is a first class citizen of > > > > javascript, I want to make sure the JSON spec is perfect. Right now > > > > attributes are this: > > > > > > > > "attributes": [ { Attribute }, { Attribute }, ... ] > > > > > > > > This will change to this: > > > > > > > > "attributes": > > > > { > > > > "patternId_1": { Attribute }, > > > > "patternId_2": { Attribute }, > > > > ... > > > > } > > > > > > > > This will much optimize the structure for javascript and likely other > > > > clients. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/devicemap/trunk/clients/2.0/javascript/ > > > > > > > > > >
