Reza, You're still the same selfish kid as before. Or some "Pop stars" who are constantly on their last tour before ending their career;-)
And still play the same egomania trip instead of working as a team. Everyone else does, people help where they can. So stop distracting the project, then it may be more succesful than if you just keep shouting around for no reason. I got 4 different talks accepted for ApacheCon Europe after a DeviceMap session last year. The community and those reviewing session proposals appreciate what I have to talk about. And I'm speaking about ALL of DeviceMap, not just the Simple DDR impementation or the Classifier(s). Everyone who cared provided input on the proposal, at least Bertrand also gave feedback on certain parts. I don't recall you actually did, but I quoted the Wiki in a representative way. You accepted suggestions like sticking to established terms like "model", "vendor", etc. Nobody asks to take every suggestion, but just stop the pathetic FUD, noise, and Djihadist behavior, that would save all of us having to listen to this crap and you (at least a bit) of a better person. Cheers, Werner On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Reza Naghibi <re...@apache.org> wrote: > Werner, you are really pushing by buttons here. > > Remember this email when I resigned from DeviceMap: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/devicemap-dev/201504.mbox/%3CCAKuYhJsPzCQsS7YrEbsRtFDbGcDsC5zEozakQwJKrOcwZrnCow%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > That agreement I keep on mentioning was the reason I decided to stay here > and work on 2.0. > > Just a reminder that the agreement was that me and you would work on > different parts of this project and that we stay out of each others way. So > please do me a favor stop engaging on my work. > > Im so very close to leaving this project and moving my work somewhere else > where I can work without your constant comments, interruptions, and > attacks. This has been going on for 2 years. You are like a never ending > nightmare... > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I guess in that early stage it seems OK. Compared to a JSR it probably is > > no further than EDR stage right now. > > > > Where say you have a particular state of the data set and either Java or > JS > > client, tagging them in a consistent way could make most sense. That was > > the main reason for any tags other than /release you'd find. > > Especially when there's something to demonstrate it is often a good idea. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Reza Naghibi <r...@naghibi.com> wrote: > > > > > While your point is valid, it doesn't change the fact that a breaking > > > change is being introduced into the specification. > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > That's why occasional snapshots would also be nice here, even if > > they're > > > > like javascript-client-2.0-alpha ;-) > > > > > > > > When ApacheCon is closer I'll have a look, but not yet. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Reza Naghibi <re...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Small chance... but just incase someone is working or looking at > the > > > > > attribute spec, its going to change. Im currently putting together > > the > > > > > javascript client [1] and given that JSON is a first class citizen > of > > > > > javascript, I want to make sure the JSON spec is perfect. Right now > > > > > attributes are this: > > > > > > > > > > "attributes": [ { Attribute }, { Attribute }, ... ] > > > > > > > > > > This will change to this: > > > > > > > > > > "attributes": > > > > > { > > > > > "patternId_1": { Attribute }, > > > > > "patternId_2": { Attribute }, > > > > > ... > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > This will much optimize the structure for javascript and likely > other > > > > > clients. > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/devicemap/trunk/clients/2.0/javascript/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
