Morning Raffaele,

at the moment the store is not used but it should be easy to use the
pointers instead of a long for the memory address. I just need to
implement this.

I also thought about some kind of a virtual memory file for swapping
purposes if the object should be just be removed from the cache but
wasn't used for a longer time (like the normal swap data).

Cheers Chris

Am 24.10.2012 00:41, schrieb Raffaele P. Guidi:
> Looks good - how does it play with the unsafe based store?
> Il giorno 23/ott/2012 21:21, "Christoph Engelbert" <[email protected]>
> ha scritto:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> some time before I mentioned that it would be nice to have a real
>> buffer interface to against. The actual implementation only had
>> ByteBuffer when using non Unsafe MemoryAllocators.
>>
>> I started to add a clean interface, derived from the nettys
>> ChannelBuffer, to be used as the main accesspoint to every memory
>> access no matter what the underlying access layer looks like.
>>
>> At the moment I'm working against the GIT fork on GitHub and I'll
>> like to see your opinion and ideas about the MemoryBuffer interface
>> and the general idea.
>>
>> The two important commits are:
>>
>> https://github.com/noctarius/directmemory/commit/5b3cf11af0e71f5961b1bfcf69b10f3cb9388ff6
>>
>> https://github.com/noctarius/directmemory/commit/05082a6aa2cac91bb2ab6e104837bb1431dae90d
>>
>> Looking forward to your replies especially because I'm not yet sure
>> how the general way of new features is :-)
>>
>> Cheers Chris
>>

Reply via email to