On 10/24/2012 09:39 PM, Christoph Engelbert wrote:
Am 24.10.2012 21:21, schrieb Johannes.Lichtenberger:
On 10/24/2012 09:03 PM, Christoph Engelbert wrote:
Am 24.10.2012 21:01, schrieb Christoph Engelbert:
Am 24.10.2012 21:00, schrieb Olivier Lamy:
2012/10/24 Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]>:
Really, really good. Well, if all tests pass why not starting
pushing the
changes to svn? :-)
+1 :-)
I guess there are no Unsafe unittests at the moment ;-) The other
tests already passed.
PS: I think it would be good to use JUnit Parameterized tests that
the same test is executed for every available MemoryManager /
Allocator.
BTW: This is really great in TestNG using the @DataProvider
annotation together with @Test(dataProvider = "foo").
JUnit has the same ability using @Parameters
http://www.mkyong.com/unittest/junit-4-tutorial-6-parameterized-test/ ;-)
Great, didn't know about this annotation :-)
According to [1] from the same guy, however it seems that the TestNG
parameters are more powerful (not restricted to primitives).
kind regards,
Johannes
[1] http://www.mkyong.com/unittest/junit-4-vs-testng-comparison/
