Am 24.10.2012 21:00, schrieb Olivier Lamy: > 2012/10/24 Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]>: >> Really, really good. Well, if all tests pass why not starting pushing the >> changes to svn? :-) > +1 :-)
I guess there are no Unsafe unittests at the moment ;-) The other tests already passed. >> Ciao, >> R >> Il giorno 24/ott/2012 11:35, "Christoph Engelbert" <[email protected]> >> ha scritto: >> >>> Hey, >>> >>> I added the codebase to support the existing UnsafeMemoryManager and >>> usage of the pointers. >>> >>> https://github.com/noctarius/directmemory/commit/dd666b673596c71bccf3d999da4da8c967370538 >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> Am 24.10.2012 09:21, schrieb Raffaele P. Guidi: >>>> just put together a test using the UnsafeStore (there's already one >>>> available) and see how it works >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Christoph Engelbert >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Morning Raffaele, >>>>> >>>>> at the moment the store is not used but it should be easy to use the >>>>> pointers instead of a long for the memory address. I just need to >>>>> implement this. >>>>> >>>>> I also thought about some kind of a virtual memory file for swapping >>>>> purposes if the object should be just be removed from the cache but >>>>> wasn't used for a longer time (like the normal swap data). >>>>> >>>>> Cheers Chris >>>>> >>>>> Am 24.10.2012 00:41, schrieb Raffaele P. Guidi: >>>>>> Looks good - how does it play with the unsafe based store? >>>>>> Il giorno 23/ott/2012 21:21, "Christoph Engelbert" < >>> [email protected] >>>>>> ha scritto: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> some time before I mentioned that it would be nice to have a real >>>>>>> buffer interface to against. The actual implementation only had >>>>>>> ByteBuffer when using non Unsafe MemoryAllocators. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I started to add a clean interface, derived from the nettys >>>>>>> ChannelBuffer, to be used as the main accesspoint to every memory >>>>>>> access no matter what the underlying access layer looks like. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At the moment I'm working against the GIT fork on GitHub and I'll >>>>>>> like to see your opinion and ideas about the MemoryBuffer interface >>>>>>> and the general idea. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The two important commits are: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> https://github.com/noctarius/directmemory/commit/5b3cf11af0e71f5961b1bfcf69b10f3cb9388ff6 >>> https://github.com/noctarius/directmemory/commit/05082a6aa2cac91bb2ab6e104837bb1431dae90d >>>>>>> Looking forward to your replies especially because I'm not yet sure >>>>>>> how the general way of new features is :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers Chris >>>>>>> >>> > >
