+1
On Jan 7, 2011 11:41 PM, "Emmanuel Lecharny" <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > we discussed about the release scheme this week, and reached a kind of > agreement that the current release scheme is not a perfect fit. > > One solution we agreed on would be to switch to use the Eclipse release > scheme, which is the following : > > Normal releases : > major.minor.fixes where some API modification requires a major > release, a feature addition requires a minor release, and the bug fixes > leads to a fixes release > > Before a major release : > M1, M2, ... : as many milestones as necessary to converge to a API > full and feature complete major version > RC1, RC2, ... : as many release candidates as necessary to > stabilize the major release, giving an opportunity for users to test the > candidate, and for us to fix the errors. > > We could also generate nightly builds adding a vAAAAMMJJ extension to > those builds, as proposed by Jesse. > > I propose a vote now, to see if everyone agrees with this schema change. > > [ ] +1 Yes, change the release scheme as described above > [ ] +/-0 I don't have an opinion > [ ] -1 No, keep the current scheme or follow another scheme > > Thanks ! > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com >
