+1 On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Felix Knecht <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On 01/07/2011 11:41 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> we discussed about the release scheme this week, and reached a kind of >> agreement that the current release scheme is not a perfect fit. >> >> One solution we agreed on would be to switch to use the Eclipse release >> scheme, which is the following : >> >> Normal releases : >> major.minor.fixes where some API modification requires a major release, >> a feature addition requires a minor release, and the bug fixes leads to >> a fixes release >> >> Before a major release : >> M1, M2, ... : as many milestones as necessary to converge to a API full >> and feature complete major version >> RC1, RC2, ... : as many release candidates as necessary to stabilize the >> major release, giving an opportunity for users to test the candidate, >> and for us to fix the errors. >> >> We could also generate nightly builds adding a vAAAAMMJJ extension to >> those builds, as proposed by Jesse. >> >> I propose a vote now, to see if everyone agrees with this schema change. >> >> [ ] +1 Yes, change the release scheme as described above >> [ ] +/-0 I don't have an opinion >> [ ] -1 No, keep the current scheme or follow another scheme >> >> Thanks ! >> > >
-- Kiran Ayyagari
