+1 On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi guys, > > we discussed about the release scheme this week, and reached a kind of > agreement that the current release scheme is not a perfect fit. > > One solution we agreed on would be to switch to use the Eclipse release > scheme, which is the following : > > Normal releases : > major.minor.fixes where some API modification requires a major release, > a feature addition requires a minor release, and the bug fixes leads to a > fixes release > > Before a major release : > M1, M2, ... : as many milestones as necessary to converge to a API full > and feature complete major version > RC1, RC2, ... : as many release candidates as necessary to stabilize the > major release, giving an opportunity for users to test the candidate, and > for us to fix the errors. > > We could also generate nightly builds adding a vAAAAMMJJ extension to those > builds, as proposed by Jesse. > > I propose a vote now, to see if everyone agrees with this schema change. > > [ ] +1 Yes, change the release scheme as described above > [ ] +/-0 I don't have an opinion > [ ] -1 No, keep the current scheme or follow another scheme > > Thanks ! > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > > -- Alex Karasulu My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu
