Le 04/01/15 00:56, Kiran Ayyagari a écrit : > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Zheng, Kai <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We should check if they’re available first. Can we be sure about that >> according to ASF conventions or whatever? If only one is ok then we might >> use it, otherwise a >> > "Kerby" is available and I don't see any naming issues with this
http://fluffy.com/ exists. kerby.com is in a DNS parking name, so there is no real company behind it. There is no similar trademarked names alive in the US : http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=toc&state=4802%3Apdw8w2.1.1&p_search=searchss&p_L=50&BackReference=&p_plural=yes&p_s_PARA1=&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA1%24LD&expr=PARA1+AND+PARA2&p_s_PARA2=kerby&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA2%24COMB&p_op_ALL=AND&a_default=search&a_search=Submit+Query&a_search=Submit+Query Apache Kerby should be just ok. We can check on [email protected] if we pick this name. Should I start a vote ?
