On 01/04/2015 04:12 AM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: > am sure you agree that name and quality are orthogonal ;) > > finally, I understand your point raised here, but I am just stressing that > naming the product based on > the technology it supports can make it easier to remember and discuss about > in the targeted technology > user circle. > > And we can definitely instill confidence if Kerby makes setting up and > maintaining a Kerberos server > as painless as possible, like what Ubuntu did for Linux.
Kerby actually is not a bad name though. It is kind of boring, which is good for security.... ;-)
