+1

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> wrote:

> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
> >
> > On Repackaging
> >
> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under
> the
> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace. For
> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a DTD
> to
> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
> >
> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to consider
> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
> >
> >
> >
> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This way
> > applications written against the early release will have the right
> > namespace already.
> >
> > -Flavio
> >
> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> > >
> > > - Sijie
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to under
> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
> > >>
> > >> - Sijie
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to