+1 On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > > > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says: > > > > On Repackaging > > > > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under > the > > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace. For > > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a DTD > to > > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar. > > > > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to consider > > carefully how they will approach this transition. > > > > > > > > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This way > > applications written against the early release will have the right > > namespace already. > > > > -Flavio > > > > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release? > > > > > > - Sijie > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to under > > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors? > > >> > > >> - Sijie > > >> > > > > >
