Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to pick it up.
- Sijie On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up? > > - KN > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnas...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says: > >> > > >> > On Repackaging > >> > > >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under > >> the > >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace. For > >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a > DTD > >> to > >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar. > >> > > >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to > consider > >> > carefully how they will approach this transition. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This > way > >> > applications written against the early release will have the right > >> > namespace already. > >> > > >> > -Flavio > >> > > >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release? > >> > > > >> > > - Sijie > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to > >> under > >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors? > >> > >> > >> > >> - Sijie > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
