Thx. Forgot to do that.
> On Jun 19, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Moving board to bcc. Don't mix public and private lists[1].
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/committer.html
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:25 AM Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Sure. I just didn't see any thread that focused and was directed at a
>> foundational question: Why Outreachy.
>>
>> All threads just seemed to assume that sponsor/support of Outreachy was
>> important/critical/useful and that doing so was just a 'given'; I just
>> thought that somewhere there should be some discussion 'proving' (or at
>> least providing a basis for) that assumption. Basically, why and what do we
>> expect to get out of it.
>>
>> I think it's a valid question to ask since it has the potential to change
>> and alter a lot of things. As such, I'm adding dev@diversity to this thread
>> in hopes that people respond.
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>>> On Jun 19, 2019, at 8:41 AM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 8:08 AM Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is some sort of engagement w/ Outreachy really that critical and crucial
>>>> to our success related to D&I? I am still not understanding this perceived
>>>> need that somehow we 'need' to figure out some way to sponsor/support
>>>> Outreachy; of it being some sort of priority. A lot of energy seems to be
>>>> going into this and I'm not sure I grok the actual value to the ASF and
>>>> our projects being worth it.
>>>
>>> Perhaps that should be discussed on dev@diversity?
>>>
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a02217bcc050fe713d33fe73fa14503c173db92a1e1a6c0b174a338c@%3Cdev.diversity.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>> - Sam Ruby
>>
