I am not subscribed to diversity-private, so it was a bit disappointing to see that these discussions are not going on in public. However, I have a question that may have already been discussed so pardon if they already have:
Outreachy appears to be a non-profit that accepts donations, do we know for sure that Outreachy cannot manage the money for us? As in, the sponsor offering the ASF target sponsorship money instead donates the money to Outreachy who then writes the check to the intern? Thanks, -Alex On 6/19/19, 10:24 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[email protected]> wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:12 PM Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2019/06/19 15:12:42, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am not understanding how other members investing their individual energy> > > into a new initiative translates into your valuation or scorn? > > If that was all, then I agree. I would have no reason nor basis to say anything. > > But that is not it. > > Instead, they are asking to spend ASF funds and bypass/work-around a long standing tenet. It is much more than just investing 'individual energy'. > > Pretend, for example, that I am interested in learning more Kotlin and investing my individual energy in doing so. No big deal right? Now pretend in doing so, I want the ASF to pay for someone to train me. At that point, it becomes much more than me just investing my own individual energy. It is expecting the ASF to fund my education, my learning, my development, my knowledge. I would fully expect such a scenario to cause... heartburn. > > I hope you see the parallels. > > -- > Jim (trying to be respectful) I acknowledge that you are trying to be respectful, but some of the basic facts: 1) Outreachy is an existing program that is well documented and aligned with the mission of this committee. If you have questions on that, the best place to start is with that documentation. If, after reading that documentation, you have specific questions, by all means bring them here. 2) There is a targeted donation in progress which could conceivably be used to fund this pilot. In its entirety. The committee has sought guidance from the board on whether or not that would be appropriate. We are awaiting a response. 3) Whether or not the development of a whimsy tool is an appropriate choice for an intern is a separate thread. If you have questions along these lines, I encourage you to participate in that thread. The quick summary: the ASF paid for the development of a "self serve tool" by infrastructure contractors. Individuals at the ASF have expressed a need for a tool to help with the development and approval of incubator reports. Perhaps with the help of the targeted donation and the Outreachy program we can satisfy this need. - Sam Ruby
