On 2019/07/14 06:11:46, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > Nicolas, > > A great example of this is ASCII. The developers (English > speakers in the US in the late 50's and early 60's) saw no real problem > with omitting ü, å, ø and ñ. Certainly some of that was likely the limitation of the technology itself, what with 8 bit chars. It was including the lowest common denominator that fit within a technology derived limit. Also, I you design something just for English speaking people, for example, and what you create becomes so popular that others wish to use it, I’m not sure if you can assign 20/20 hindsight.
- Advantages of Diversity and Inclusion Awasum Yannick
- Re: Advantages of Diversity and Inclusion Niclas Hedhman
- Re: Advantages of Diversity and Inclusion Justin Mclean
- Re: Advantages of Diversity and Inclusion Niclas Hedhman
- Re: Advantages of Diversity and Inclusion Myrle Krantz
- Re: Advantages of Diversity and Inclusion Ted Dunning
- Re: Advantages of Diversity and Inclusion Niclas Hedhman
- Re: Advantages of Diversity and Inclusion Ted Dunning
- Re: Advantages of Diversity and Inclusion Myrle Krantz
- Re: Advantages of Diversity and Inclusion Jim Jagielski
- Re: Advantages of Diversity and Inclusion Ted Dunning
- Re: Advantages of Diversity and Inclusion Gris Cuevas
