Hi Jarek, Thank you for the response, and I apology for the late reply.
for example we could add "Project X is > doing it for years, if you want to see effect of it - here is the link, and > you can go talk to them - for example on devlist or on #issue-triage > channel on their slack etc. ). Happy to add such links to the wiki if you > think it is a good idea. Those projects might get "mentoring" or rather > "lead by example" function in the process. I would appreciate it if you add the links and any other thoughts here. Feel free to do it; this is live documentation! Also it might be worth mentioning that for those projects (so pretty much > everyone) that use Github, the "good first issue" is already part of the > Github Ecosystem and tagging issues with "good first issue" label taps into > to that. I will add this info to the wiki! I am glad I addressed the relevance of this initiative in the wiki; this was my main concern. Now that I have finished most of my Master's activities, I will come back to this subject. Team, please let me know if anyone also has any considerations. Best Gláucia Em qua., 1 de nov. de 2023 às 23:31, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> escreveu: > I think it's a good idea to encourage other projects. I read the page and > it very well describes the effects such tags might have (from our > experience) > > One proposal - I have not seen how projects that are already doing it might > be used as "good examples" - but I think we will be happy to share our > (good) experiences - and it might be a good thing to refer to some other > projects whe are already doing it - for example we could add "Project X is > doing it for years, if you want to see effect of it - here is the link, and > you can go talk to them - for example on devlist or on #issue-triage > channel on their slack etc. ). Happy to add such links to the wiki if you > think it is a good idea. Those projects might get "mentoring" or rather > "lead by example" function in the process. > > For example I know that most of the projects from the "data engineering" > area that are close to us already follow that: Apache Airflow, Apache > Beam, Apache Superset, Apache Iceberg - are all actively marking issues as > "good first issues" during their triaging. > I don't speak for others but our experience is very positive - people are > actually actively looking and "grabbing" such "good first issues" - we also > use them during our contribution workshops and in talks when we are > encouraging people to contribute. > > Also it might be worth mentioning that for those projects (so pretty much > everyone) that use Github, the "good first issue" is already part of the > Github Ecosystem and tagging issues with "good first issue" label taps into > to that. This is also why it is part of the standard process of triaging > issues by a number of projects. it is also is supported and encouraged by > Github in their "Building Communities" documentations - > > https://docs.github.com/en/communities/setting-up-your-project-for-healthy-contributions/encouraging-helpful-contributions-to-your-project-with-labels > . > So it's worth to be aware that we are not reinventing the wheel and opening > doors, but rather we are telling our projects how they can tap into even > bigger ecosystem that is already there. > > So it's not just a "label" - it also makes the issues automatically > discoverable and surfaced by other mechanisms that already understand that > "good first issue" is the way by which projects mark issues as - indeed - > good first issues to contribute as a GitHub standard. > > For example all issues marked this way automatically land in the " > *contribute*" page of the project. This page has links to contribution > guidelines if projects have them and are often referred to by any sites > that have advice for people to start contributing. And the more projects > will start using it, the more "obvious" it will be for contributors that > they can use it. It might be even worth it to see how many projects already > follow it. Here are the pages from the projects I mentioned > > * https://github.com/apache/beam/contribute > * https://github.com/apache/airflow/contribute > * https://github.com/apache/superset/contribute > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/contribute > > Those page also contain a nice explanation and encouragement explaining > what it is all about: > > > Make your first contribution to this repository by tackling one of the > issues listed below. > > Read the contributing guidelines > > Each issue displayed here is a "good first issue," selected for its > relative approachability for first-time contributors. > > J, > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 11:36 PM Gláucia Esppenchutz <glauesp...@apache.org > > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone! > > > > In the last BoF, we discussed the possibility of creating and assigning a > > "good first issue" to some Apache projects and attracting newcomers. > > I made a small wiki page with this topic, covering the motivation, the > > objective, and how we can start it. > > You can find it here: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=278465058 > > > > Please let me know what you think. > > I will start doing some research on the Apache reports to try to identify > > potential participants. > > I believe one of the incubator projects (Wayang) might be already > > interested, but let me know if they can participate. > > Have a lovely evening! > > > > Gláucia > > > -- Gláucia Esppenchutz ----------------------------------------------------- Twitter: @lyuric19 Linkedin: https://br.linkedin.com/pub/gláucia-esppenchutz/47/81a/312