G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
Gary Schnabl wrote:
As to the most recent versions, I checked the list of files for that and
most of the comments mentioned in your issue. AFAIK, I'm using the most
recent versions, as posted for your issue.
Really? I do not think so. I just checked the issue and low and behold there is a
more recent instance of the the overview section that has none of the "errors" quoted above.
Gary,
I haven't a clue what you are using but my copy of the overview is
attached to 29679 and is in the process of being integrated. I suggest
you have a look. @uite frankly I think you have grabbed files that are
*NOT* part of the current master and are
If Gary has been unable to tell which attachment is the latest
version of a chapter, that is a good example of the difficulties
of using the Issue system for keeping track of things, esp. when
out of date versions of a chapter are not (can not be?) removed
from the issue... and it's hard to tell who is working on what,
and what stage a particular chapter has reached.
Docs really needs a better system for tracking things. I honestly
don't know what's best to suggest, but we really should be
looking seriously at the possibilities. (Scott and Ger, if you
are doing this and I'm not aware of it, my apologies.) One
possibility I can think of is to use a section of the
Documentation wiki for tracking. Of course that depends on people
actually putting info into the wiki in a timely manner.
Regards, Jean
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
