On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 22:10 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote: > Hi Gerry, all, > > let's try to come back to the original question - personal differences > don't need to be expressed on-list IMHO. > > I removed the whole discussion because the informations have been more > or less hidden by the negative feelings. > > If I understand you right, you thought Avery to be supported more than > other brands in the label wizard. > > As Christian pointed out, this is only because Avery is the only brand > starting with "a" and the list of brands is sorted alphabetically. > > To make this point more clear, I created a screenshot with my m199 version: > http://www.familie-dippold.de/OpenOffice.org/label_screenshot.png > > You see Avery as first entry, but several other brands as part of the list. > > So there is no specific support for Avery IMHO (and this doesn't have to > do anything with OOo's origin as StarOffice). > > Of course this list should include WorldLabel and its label formats - > but this might be quite easy - just file an issue giving the appropriate > informations. >
No. What I am saying is that we have sponsors who support OOo directly. I feel that their products should take precedence over other manufacturers who are not contributing or sponsoring. SO the idea is taht if these latter entities wish to continue to receive the current status they should contribute in someway, as in financial or other way, or be supplanted by those entities/companies that do support OOo directly. That Avery starts with "a" is immaterial to the discussion. -- G. Roderick Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
