Jim Harris wrote:
...I don't think we should waste resources producing PDFs anyway.
Jim, our resources are volunteers like me, and we work on whatever is most interesting or important to us. If I want PDFs (which I do, for the printed books), I'm going to make PDFs, whether the project as a whole thinks that's a waste of my time or not. And then I will give the PDFs back to the project.
It's perfectly reasonable for the project to officially consider PDFs to be low priority; that's another matter.
In an earlier note, you said:
by definition the PDFs would simply be duplicates of the source info, requiring re-generation every time a source page is changed in order to stay current,
I don't see any major reason why PDFs need to be totally current with the source material, as long as the page where users get them clearly states that the most up to date info is wherever it is.
--Jean --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
