I can’t agree with @ Hemin Wen more. 我也认为不应该提供直接修改工作流实例的功能，不能说因为简单就要添加这样的功能。如果觉得offline、online麻烦，是不是意味着offline、online的功能不合理？ 另外测试工作流实例，然后去更新工作流？这是什么鬼畜逻辑？绝对应该先定义好工作流，再去测试
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 at 10:42 To: dev <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] About modify workflow instance function I think it's neccesary to keep this function. 1.If we need update the proress definition,If upate the process definiton direcly,we need change it's state from online to offline,and when we modified,need change it's state from offline to online. So I think it's easy-to-use to keep the function, when update the process instance support the choise whether decide to update the process definition. 2.It's have another benefit,we can test the process instance first,if it runs successful,then we can decide to update the process definition directly. Of course,we can enhance this function with permission controler,Such as only someone who have permission can update the process definiton by update the process instance. Best Regards DolphinScheduler(Incubator) PPMC Gang Li 李岗 [email protected] From: Hemin Wen Date: 2020-11-30 10:09 To: dev Subject: [DISCUSS] About modify workflow instance function Hi, all! Currently, DS supports editing workflow instance while updating workflow definition, You can also choose not to update the workflow definition, there is a check box here. I guess the reason of this design, Add the entry in the workflow instance, Workflow can be updated without offline workflow definition. I did not think of a scenario where only the workflow instance is updated. Modifying only the workflow instance without updating the definition will also lead to inconsistent data. So, Is it possible to remove the check box for updating the workflow definition here? -------------------- DolphinScheduler(Incubator) Commtter Hemin Wen 温合民 [email protected] --------------------
