On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 18:21:56 +0000 Marat Khalili <[email protected]> wrote:
> Direct assignment to an atomic variable defaults to sequentially > consistent memory order in C11. Since cross-thread memory ordering > for packet callback execution and unload is already explicitly > enforced by memory barriers, sequentially consistent stores are > unnecessary and may emit redundant barrier instructions on weakly > ordered architectures. > > Update bpf_eth_cbi_inuse() and bpf_eth_cbi_unuse() to use > rte_atomic_store_explicit() with rte_memory_order_relaxed, matching > the relaxed loads already used in bpf_eth_cbi_wait(). > > Signed-off-by: Marat Khalili <[email protected]> > --- Already covered by smb_mb conversion patch. If you want, can just make that into one patch which does the conversion to bool and gets rid of smp_mb.
