> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com] > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 9:54 AM > To: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Horton, Remy > <remy.hor...@intel.com> > Cc: Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pat...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; > olivier.m...@6wind.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] latencystats: added new library for > latency stats > > ... > > > > Is that an issue? The other patch adds the same field for more or less > the same purpose. > > If the other patch goes in we can rework this patch or if this patch > > goes in the other one won't be required. > > Yes > The only issue is that it is not yet accepted or merged. > I think Olivier was considering it in a more global mbuf rework.
Hi, I think we should put the timestamp into this release since more than one developer/feature is looking for it. If Olivier does the rework in the next release he can move it or leave it in the current position. John
