-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32083/#review77944
-----------------------------------------------------------



exec/java-exec/src/main/codegen/templates/SqlAccessors.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/32083/#comment126308>

    Like we discussed offline, we are performing the isnull checks in the 
SqlAccessor layer and also in the Vector's accessor.



exec/java-exec/src/main/codegen/templates/SqlAccessors.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/32083/#comment126303>

    We don't have TimeStampTZ any more. You can remove this block.


- Mehant Baid


On March 23, 2015, 8:21 p.m., Daniel Barclay wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/32083/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 23, 2015, 8:21 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for drill, Mehant Baid and Parth Chandra.
> 
> 
> Repository: drill-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added null checks to ResultSet.getTYPE(...) methods to return dummy values 
> for SQL NULL (e.g., 0 for getInt(...), Java null for getString()).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   exec/java-exec/src/main/codegen/config.fmpp 5dc7360 
>   exec/java-exec/src/main/codegen/templates/SqlAccessors.java 3039e5c 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/vector/accessor/BoundCheckingAccessor.java
>  7e8da2c 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/vector/accessor/SqlAccessor.java
>  b69ae54 
>   exec/jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/jdbc/AvaticaDrillSqlAccessor.java 
> 3702257 
>   
> exec/jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/jdbc/test/Drill2463GetNullsFailedWithAssertionsBugTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32083/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran new tests for JDBC metadata fixes (DRILL-2420--related) and existing 
> tests.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniel Barclay
> 
>

Reply via email to