+1 on a release and +1 on DRILL-3423 - Add New HTTPD format plugin, but I may be biased on that one ;-)
> On Oct 29, 2016, at 14:27, Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have several JIRAs regarding metadata I worked on recently and would like > to see resolved before 1.9: > > - DRILL-1268: Add unit test to C++ native client > - DRILL-4853: Update C++ protobuf source files > - DRILL-4420: C++ API for metadata access and prepared statements > - DRILL-1996: Add cancel method to Drill C++ connector > > Those changes are all part of PR #602 ( > https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/602) and have been reviewed by Parth. > > - DRILL-4730: Update JDBC DatabaseMetaData implementation to use new > Metadata APIs > This is PR #613 (https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/613), and is waiting > for some reviews > > - DRILL-4945: Report INTERVAL exact type as column type name > This is PR #618 (https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/618), and is waiting > for some reviews > > - DRILL-4969: Basic implementation of display size for column metadata > This is PR #632 (https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/632), and is waiting > for some reviews > > Cheers, > > Laurent > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Parth Chandra <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 on doing a release. >> >> I'm hoping the following get a +1 : >> >> DRILL-4800 - Improve parquet reader performance >> DRILL-3423 - Add New HTTPD format plugin >> DRILL-4858 - REPEATED_COUNT on JSON containing an array of maps >> >> Specifically what did you want to discuss about the release number after >> 1.9? Ordinarily you would just go to 2.0. The only reason for holding off >> on 2.0, that I can think of, is if you want to make breaking changes in the >> 2.0 release and those are not going to be ready for the next release cycle. >> Are any dev's planning on such breaking changes? If so we should discuss >> that (or any other reason we might have for deferring 2.0) in a separate >> thread? >> I'm +0 on any version number we chose. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Sudheesh Katkam <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Let's aim for EOD next Friday (11/04/16) to get all changes in; I will >> try >>> to get RC0 out on Monday (11/07/16). >>> >>> Current list of commits: >>> >>> [Sudheesh] >>> + DRILL-4280: pull request being reviewed >>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/578 >>> >>> [Jinfeng] >>> + DRILL-1950: pull request pending >>> >>> Any other pull requests that developers would like to get into the >> release? >>> Please post the status too. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Sudheesh >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Jinfeng Ni <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> I'm working on DRILL-1950 to support parquet row group level filter >>>> pruning. I plan to submit a pull request for code review in 1-2 days, >>>> hopefully. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Aman Sinha <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Sudheesh Katkam < >> [email protected] >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Drillers, >>>>>> >>>>>> We have a reasonable number of fixes and features since the last >>> release >>>>>> [1]. Releasing itself takes a while; so I propose we start the 1.9 >>>> release >>>>>> process. >>>>>> >>>>>> I volunteer as the release manager, unless there are objections. >>>>>> >>>>>> We should also discuss what the release version number should be >> after >>>> 1.9. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>> Sudheesh >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL/ >>> fixforversion/12337861 >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>
