Agreed with Parth that we probably should start a separate thread to discuss release version number after 1.9.0.
I'll start a new thread to discuss that, and leave this thread for drill 1.9.0 release matters. On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Sudheesh Katkam <[email protected]> wrote: > Gentle reminder that all check-ins should be done by tomorrow. Please see > the latest statuses of commits that we are targeting: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UJSXLrfUNZwUnx_ > JzkwAcXSxmcbG7meBDad6ZTxlSmw > > Thank you, > Sudheesh > > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Sudheesh Katkam <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The current list of candidate commits for the release is here: >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UJSXLrfUNZwUnx_ >> JzkwAcXSxmcbG7meBDad6ZTxlSmw >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Subbu Srinivasan <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> +1. >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Paul Rogers <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > For release numbers, 1.10 (then 1.11, 1.12, …) seems like a good idea. >>> > >>> > At first it may seem odd to go to 1.10 from 1.9. Might people get >>> confused >>> > between 1.10 and 1.1.0? But, there is precedence. Tomcat’s latest >>> 7-series >>> > release is 7.0.72. Java is on 8u112. And so on. >>> > >>> > I like the idea of moving to 2.0 later when the team introduces a major >>> > change, rather than by default just because the numbers roll around. For >>> > example, Hadoop when to 2.x when YARN was introduced. Impala appears to >>> > have moved to 2.0 when they added Spill to disk for some (all?) >>> operators. >>> > >>> > - Paul >>> > >>> > > On Oct 28, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Sudheesh Katkam <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Hi Drillers, >>> > > >>> > > We have a reasonable number of fixes and features since the last >>> release >>> > > [1]. Releasing itself takes a while; so I propose we start the 1.9 >>> > release >>> > > process. >>> > > >>> > > I volunteer as the release manager, unless there are objections. >>> > > >>> > > We should also discuss what the release version number should be after >>> > 1.9. >>> > > >>> > > Thank you, >>> > > Sudheesh >>> > > >>> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL/fixforversion/ >>> 12337861 >>> > >>> > >>> >> >>
