On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 12:33 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I suggest you don't use slack or any other instant message as doing will > Can't agree more. > exclude some people due to the platform used or time zone they are in or > language used. Also these conversations can be hard to search and may not > be archived. > > All decisions need be made in publc on the mailing list and it should be > the primary firm of communication. > > Thanks, > Justin > > On Fri., 7 Sep. 2018, 2:17 pm Ian Luo, <ian....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I lean to use Slack for main means of chatting. Dingtalk is popular in > > China, but it is indeed inappropriate for public communication. I agree > we > > should change. > > > > I tried the-asf workspace. It looks like it accepts subscriptions from > > apache committers only. > > > > What about one dedicated workspace for Dubbo? In this way, we could > gather > > both dubbo user and dubbo developer in one single place, and more > > important, all discussions are public. > > > > What do you think? > > > > -Ian. > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 11:33 AM Jerrick Zhu <jerr...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > hi, community > > > > > > Now, we have some chat groups, which are used to discuss about dubbo, > > such > > > as: > > > > > > * Dingtalk group, nearly 30 people, committers and contributors > > > * WeChat group, contains committers, contributors, and many users > > > > > > I think we need to public these chat groups, so that all people can > join > > > us. > > > > > > Maybe Gitter? or Slack ? > > > > > > Or maybe we can drop the chat, just use the mailing list and github > issue > > > for discuss. > > > > > > Any other suggestions? > > > > > > Sincerely. > > > > > > jerrick > > > > > >
