Then let's provider the official image. The request from the users is always priority one we should consider.
-Ian. On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 2:07 PM YunKun Huang <[email protected]> wrote: > I think only provide a docker-compose file in project is not a good idea, > this still require user to compile and build image in their local. It will > spend many time since it require npm dependencies and maven dependencies. > > As Justin's suggestion, we can provide official docker image in docker-hub > with release version only, if user want to latest code, their can use > dockerfile to build by themselves. > > On 2019/03/14 07:48:08, Ian Luo <[email protected]> wrote: > > or at least we can bundle a docker-compose.yaml in dubbo admin project. > > > > -Ian. > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 11:55 AM Justin Mclean <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > I've see a dubbo-admin docker image[1], which is maintained by one of > > > > the Dubbo PPMC. To some extend this might be a violation of ASF > > > > distribution policy - we should always distribute the source/binary > > > > with the approval of Dubbo PPMC. > > > > > > I can see that this docker image is providing unreleased code the > general > > > public that’s probably not the best idea. I think it would be better if > > > this docker image only pointed to the latest official release. There > are > > > some branding and trademark issues here as well. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Justin > > >
