Nice to hear that!

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 2:30 PM YunKun Huang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I would like to work on this stuff and I already did some research at 
> https://issues.apache.org/
>
> Looks like there are two way to do this.
>  1. ask push permission and push image to dockerhub
>  2. ask infra team to add auto build rule to create image in dockerhub
>
> But as first step, we need a dubbo repo in dockerhub. I already raised a 
> ticket for infra team to request dubbo dockerhub repo. 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18167
>
> After I figure out whole process to do this, I will summary a document in 
> blog or wiki.
>
> Regards,
> Yunkun Huang
>
> On 2019/03/18 13:28:28, Ian Luo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Then let's provider the official image. The request from the users is
> > always priority one we should consider.
> >
> > -Ian.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 2:07 PM YunKun Huang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I think only provide a docker-compose file in project is not a good idea,
> > > this still require user to compile and build image in their local. It will
> > > spend many time since it require npm dependencies and maven dependencies.
> > >
> > > As Justin's suggestion, we can provide official docker image in docker-hub
> > > with release version only, if user want to latest code, their can use
> > > dockerfile to build by themselves.
> > >
> > > On 2019/03/14 07:48:08, Ian Luo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > or at least we can bundle a docker-compose.yaml in dubbo admin project.
> > > >
> > > > -Ian.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 11:55 AM Justin Mclean <[email protected]
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > > I've see a dubbo-admin docker image[1], which is maintained by one 
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > the Dubbo PPMC. To some extend this might be a violation of ASF
> > > > > > distribution policy - we should always distribute the source/binary
> > > > > > with the approval of Dubbo PPMC.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can see that this docker image is providing unreleased code the
> > > general
> > > > > public that’s probably not the best idea. I think it would be better 
> > > > > if
> > > > > this docker image only pointed to the latest official release. There
> > > are
> > > > > some branding and trademark issues here as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Justin
> > > >
> > >
> >



-- 
Best Regards!
Huxing

Reply via email to