Ralph, I think it¹s time you join the committers list by submitting ACLA.
Thanks Edward On 12/9/15, 16:48, "sul*fei" <[email protected]> wrote: >That would be fine. We might not be assignee before become committer.(not >sure) Contributor could also send pull request:) > > > >At 2015-12-09 23:41:34, "Michael Wu" <[email protected]> wrote: >>Hao, >> >>EAGLE-84 is created. I'm not able to assign it to myself. Is it possible >>that you add permission to my jira account "wuziyang"? Thanks. >> >>Michael >> >>On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Hao Chen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Michael :-) >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Hao >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Wu, Michael(Ziyang) >>><[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Sure Hao, I¹ll create a ticket for this task and update it with the >>> status. >>> > >>> > Michael >>> > >>> > From: Hao Chen <[email protected]> >>> > Date: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 at 16:45 >>> > To: "[email protected]" >>><[email protected]>, >>> > "Wu , Michael(Ziyang)" <[email protected]> >>> > Subject: Re: About dev process >>> > >>> > Michael, I think you are working on the task creating the automatic >>> script >>> > for the dev process? What's the status and do you have ticket to >>>track >>> your >>> > work? >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > Hao >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Hao Chen <[email protected]> >>>wrote: >>> > >>> >> Liangfei, >>> >> >>> >> Could you please help document the process in Eagle wiki and we >>>could >>> >> finalize the process ASAP? U.S. and Indian committers are pending on >>> this >>> >> process to merge new features. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> >>> >> Hao >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Liangfei.Su <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Yes, the '[]' is not expected here. It should be typo when i copy >>>from >>> my >>> >>> text editor. We don't need that. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regarding the author and reviewer, i agree that they're optional. >>>The >>> >>> main >>> >>> idea here is that if we could states the name of reviewers here. >>>(And >>> >>> yes, >>> >>> the reviewers should give their comments on pull request page >>>which is >>> >>> traceable from the ${ticket_number}, just want to make this >>>information >>> >>> explicitly here :) ). Let's make this info as optional. >>> >>> >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > One minor problem with the "[EAGLE-${ticket_number}] message" >>>format >>> >>> is the >>> >>> > 'git am' command. When it reads patches from a mail box, it uses >>>the >>> >>> > subject of each email as the commit message but it strips off >>>any [ >>> >>> ... ] >>> >>> > at the start of the subject. So, even though we use this format >>>in >>> >>> Calcite, >>> >>> > if we started over, I think we might use something like >>> >>> > "EAGLE-{ticket_number}: message" (without brackets) instead. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Strictly, you don't need the "Author:" and "Reviewer:" lines >>>because >>> >>> they >>> >>> > are contained in the git metadata. But you probably know that >>> already. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Julian >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Liangfei.Su >>><[email protected]> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> >>> > > Hi, PMCs >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > To help clear the dev process, i'm trying to put this into >>>eagle >>> >>> WIKI. >>> >>> > > Please advise if it's OK to all. >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > The referenced commit msg format is: >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > [EAGLE-${ticket_number}] ${ticket_title} >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > ${ticket_url} >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > Author: ${commiter} >>> >>> > > Reviewer: ${reviewer} >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > Closes #${pr_number} from ${do_person} >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > Thanks, >>> >>> > > Ralph >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>>
