That would be fine. We might not be assignee before become committer.(not sure) Contributor could also send pull request:)
At 2015-12-09 23:41:34, "Michael Wu" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hao, > >EAGLE-84 is created. I'm not able to assign it to myself. Is it possible >that you add permission to my jira account "wuziyang"? Thanks. > >Michael > >On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Hao Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Michael :-) >> >> >> -- >> >> Hao >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Wu, Michael(Ziyang) <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Sure Hao, I’ll create a ticket for this task and update it with the >> status. >> > >> > Michael >> > >> > From: Hao Chen <[email protected]> >> > Date: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 at 16:45 >> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, >> > "Wu , Michael(Ziyang)" <[email protected]> >> > Subject: Re: About dev process >> > >> > Michael, I think you are working on the task creating the automatic >> script >> > for the dev process? What's the status and do you have ticket to track >> your >> > work? >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Hao >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Hao Chen <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Liangfei, >> >> >> >> Could you please help document the process in Eagle wiki and we could >> >> finalize the process ASAP? U.S. and Indian committers are pending on >> this >> >> process to merge new features. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Hao >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Liangfei.Su <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Yes, the '[]' is not expected here. It should be typo when i copy from >> my >> >>> text editor. We don't need that. >> >>> >> >>> Regarding the author and reviewer, i agree that they're optional. The >> >>> main >> >>> idea here is that if we could states the name of reviewers here. (And >> >>> yes, >> >>> the reviewers should give their comments on pull request page which is >> >>> traceable from the ${ticket_number}, just want to make this information >> >>> explicitly here :) ). Let's make this info as optional. >> >>> >> >>> Ralph >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > One minor problem with the "[EAGLE-${ticket_number}] message" format >> >>> is the >> >>> > 'git am' command. When it reads patches from a mail box, it uses the >> >>> > subject of each email as the commit message but it strips off any [ >> >>> ... ] >> >>> > at the start of the subject. So, even though we use this format in >> >>> Calcite, >> >>> > if we started over, I think we might use something like >> >>> > "EAGLE-{ticket_number}: message" (without brackets) instead. >> >>> > >> >>> > Strictly, you don't need the "Author:" and "Reviewer:" lines because >> >>> they >> >>> > are contained in the git metadata. But you probably know that >> already. >> >>> > >> >>> > Julian >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Liangfei.Su <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > > Hi, PMCs >> >>> > > >> >>> > > To help clear the dev process, i'm trying to put this into eagle >> >>> WIKI. >> >>> > > Please advise if it's OK to all. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > The referenced commit msg format is: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > [EAGLE-${ticket_number}] ${ticket_title} >> >>> > > >> >>> > > ${ticket_url} >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Author: ${commiter} >> >>> > > Reviewer: ${reviewer} >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Closes #${pr_number} from ${do_person} >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Thanks, >> >>> > > Ralph >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
