Hi Jan, you are absolutely right: instead of the sha hash the file contained the md5 hash. I have corrected it now. Please check again.
Regards Rainer > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.4.6 (rc2) > > Hello Rainer, > > how did you create the sha sum? I cant validate its correct: > > [jan ~/tmp] sha1 apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip > SHA1 (apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip) = > 9d0f4e28334561e15458671b7b093b7b3cc5f9cb > > yours look a little bit short...? > > > Which key did you use to create the PGP signature? I can't verify with they > KEYS file from the website: > > [jan ~/tmp] gpg --verify apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip.asc > gpg: Warning: using insecure memory! > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip' > gpg: Signature made Mon Jan 9 11:46:48 2017 CET > gpg: using RSA key 0279D7D50B5DFB51 > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key > > - jan > > Zitat von Rainer Döbele <[email protected]>: > > > Hi all, > > > > Due to an incorrect distribution file I have cancelled rc1 and > > prepared a second release candidate for version 2.4.6. > > Please do all check and vote again on this release candidate. > > > > A list of all resolved issues for this release can be found here: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMPIREDB- > 250?jql=project%20%3D%2 > > 0EMPIREDB%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(empire-db- > 2.4.6%2C%20empire-db-2. > > > 4.5)%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20create > d%20ASC > > > > Maven staging repository: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheempire-db- > > 1004/ > > > > The distribution files are located here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/empire-db/apache-empire-db-2.4. > > 6-rc2/ > > > > The Rat report for the tag is available here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/empire-db/apache-empire-db-2.4. > > 6-rc2/rat.txt > > > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 > >
