Not really, its just an address 🤷🏻‍♂️ and I dont think you wanna use it for 
real E-Mails. Just dont lose your private key ;-)

+1

Von meinem iPhone gesendet

> Am 12.01.2017 um 09:53 schrieb Rainer Döbele <[email protected]>:
> 
> I have now updated the KEYS file.
> 
> (Unfortunately I have created the key using my business email rather than my 
> apache.org email - does it matter?)
> 
> Regards,
> Rainer
> 
>> From: Francis De Brabandere [mailto:[email protected]]
>> To: dev <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.4.6 (rc2)
>> 
>> So once the KEYS file is updated this is a +1 from me
>> 
>> On 10 January 2017 at 15:41, Francis De Brabandere <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> @Jan, you can import the signature from the mit keyserver gpg
>>> --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key 0B5DFB51
>>> 
>>> @Rainer the KEYS file is still not updated
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/empire-db/KEYS
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> F
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 10 January 2017 at 08:39, Jan Glaubitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello Rainer,
>>>> 
>>>> SHA works now (but: maybe we should use at least SHA256?)
>>>> 
>>>> I'm still unable to verify the PGP signature.
>>>> 
>>>> - jan
>>>> 
>>>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 10.01.2017 um 08:18 schrieb Rainer Döbele <[email protected]>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Jan,
>>>>> 
>>>>> you are absolutely right: instead of the sha hash the file
>>>>> contained
>>>> the md5 hash.
>>>>> I have corrected it now.
>>>>> Please check again.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Rainer
>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.4.6 (rc2)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello Rainer,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> how did you create the sha sum? I cant validate its correct:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [jan ~/tmp] sha1 apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip
>>>>>> SHA1 (apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip) =
>>>>>> 9d0f4e28334561e15458671b7b093b7b3cc5f9cb
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> yours look a little bit short...?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Which key did you use to create the PGP signature? I can't verify
>>>>>> with
>>>> they
>>>>>> KEYS file from the website:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [jan ~/tmp] gpg --verify apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip.asc
>>>>>> gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
>>>>>> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip'
>>>>>> gpg: Signature made Mon Jan  9 11:46:48 2017 CET
>>>>>> gpg:                using RSA key 0279D7D50B5DFB51
>>>>>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - jan
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Zitat von Rainer Döbele <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Due to an incorrect distribution file I have cancelled rc1 and
>>>>>>> prepared a second release candidate for version 2.4.6.
>>>>>>> Please do all check and vote again on this release candidate.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A list of all resolved issues for this release can be found here:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMPIREDB-
>>>>>> 250?jql=project%20%3D%2
>>>>>>> 0EMPIREDB%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(empire-db-
>>>>>> 2.4.6%2C%20empire-db-2.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> 4.5)%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20create
>>>>>> d%20ASC
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Maven staging repository:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>> empire-db-
>>>>>>> 1004/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The distribution files are located here:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/empire-db/apache-empire-
>> db
>>>>>>> -2.4
>>>> .
>>>>>>> 6-rc2/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The Rat report for the tag is available here:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/empire-db/apache-empire-
>> db
>>>>>>> -2.4
>>>> .
>>>>>>> 6-rc2/rat.txt
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [ ] +1
>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>> [ ] -1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 

Reply via email to