Hmm,

2.4.4 dist works for me

gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key AE64E518

gpg --verify apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz.asc
gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Tue Aug 11 12:18:34 2015 CEST using DSA key ID AE64E518
gpg: Good signature from "Francis De Brabandere <[email protected]>"
[ultimate]

➜  md5 apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz
MD5 (apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz) = 2a461179e34afe0b2acaf9e42503e33f
➜  cat apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz.md5
2a461179e34afe0b2acaf9e42503e33f
 ./target/apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz
➜  openssl sha1 apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz
SHA1(apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz)=
fe9fd8d45332a7e4db0f4d444e0941d182c31116
➜  cat apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz.sha
fe9fd8d45332a7e4db0f4d444e0941d182c31116
 ./target/apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz

both sha and md5 match here for tar.gz

same for zip

➜  cat apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip.sha
b46a4ea4feed1c2686c2ba2b6b0bf8c89ac21acf
 ./target/apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip
➜  openssl sha1 apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip
SHA1(apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip)=
b46a4ea4feed1c2686c2ba2b6b0bf8c89ac21acf




On 10 January 2017 at 15:52, <[email protected]> wrote:

> thx, I can verify 2.4.6rc2 now.
>
> but 2.4.4 from website is still broken:
>
> [jan ~/tmp] gpg --verify apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip.asc
> gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip'
> gpg: Signature made Tue Aug 11 12:18:34 2015 CEST
> gpg:                using DSA key 593A1304AE64E518
> gpg: BAD signature from "Francis De Brabandere <[email protected]>"
> [unknown]
>
> md5 & sha are also bad:
>
> b735ed3a4f477d8f1a03c6de22c7b361  ./target/apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip
>
> [jan ~/tmp] md5 apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip
> MD5 (apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip) = 2ea5495d519307a7987fd08182c688ed
>
> b46a4ea4feed1c2686c2ba2b6b0bf8c89ac21acf  ./target/apache-empire-db-2.4.
> 4-dist.zip
>
> [jan ~/tmp] sha1 apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip
> SHA1 (apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip) = 96f788b9dc564e607052903eb6e091
> f041ade075
>
> are we sure nobody touched it...?
>
> - jan
>
> Zitat von Francis De Brabandere <[email protected]>:
>
>
> @Jan, you can import the signature from the mit keyserver
>> gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key 0B5DFB51
>>
>> @Rainer the KEYS file is still not updated
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/empire-db/KEYS
>>
>> Cheers,
>> F
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10 January 2017 at 08:39, Jan Glaubitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Rainer,
>>>
>>> SHA works now (but: maybe we should use at least SHA256?)
>>>
>>> I'm still unable to verify the PGP signature.
>>>
>>> - jan
>>>
>>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>>
>>> > Am 10.01.2017 um 08:18 schrieb Rainer Döbele <[email protected]>:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Jan,
>>> >
>>> > you are absolutely right: instead of the sha hash the file contained
>>> the
>>> md5 hash.
>>> > I have corrected it now.
>>> > Please check again.
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Rainer
>>> >
>>> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> >> To: [email protected]
>>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.4.6 (rc2)
>>> >>
>>> >> Hello Rainer,
>>> >>
>>> >> how did you create the sha sum? I cant validate its correct:
>>> >>
>>> >> [jan ~/tmp] sha1 apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip
>>> >> SHA1 (apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip) =
>>> >> 9d0f4e28334561e15458671b7b093b7b3cc5f9cb
>>> >>
>>> >> yours look a little bit short...?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Which key did you use to create the PGP signature? I can't verify with
>>> they
>>> >> KEYS file from the website:
>>> >>
>>> >> [jan ~/tmp] gpg --verify apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip.asc
>>> >> gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
>>> >> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip'
>>> >> gpg: Signature made Mon Jan  9 11:46:48 2017 CET
>>> >> gpg:                using RSA key 0279D7D50B5DFB51
>>> >> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>> >>
>>> >> - jan
>>> >>
>>> >> Zitat von Rainer Döbele <[email protected]>:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi all,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Due to an incorrect distribution file I have cancelled rc1 and
>>> >>> prepared a second release candidate for version 2.4.6.
>>> >>> Please do all check and vote again on this release candidate.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> A list of all resolved issues for this release can be found here:
>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMPIREDB-
>>> >> 250?jql=project%20%3D%2
>>> >>> 0EMPIREDB%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(empire-db-
>>> >> 2.4.6%2C%20empire-db-2.
>>> >>>
>>> >> 4.5)%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20create
>>> >> d%20ASC
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Maven staging repository:
>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>> empire-db-
>>> >>> 1004/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The distribution files are located here:
>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/empire-db/apache-empi
>>> re-db-2.4.
>>> >>> 6-rc2/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The Rat report for the tag is available here:
>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/empire-db/apache-empi
>>> re-db-2.4.
>>> >>> 6-rc2/rat.txt
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [ ] +1
>>> >>> [ ] +0
>>> >>> [ ] -1
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to