I am not working in any of the branches.. /Anne
On 3 April 2011 13:58, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]> wrote: > I did practically nothing on that branch before I had questions about how > prevalent and therefore how necessary pubsubhubub was for ESME particularly > after the originator Ethan said, that he kind of started it a 'science > project' for himself, in one of his replies. > > We should just go ahead and delete that branch. We can always create an > upto-date one in the future, if I or someone else decides to resume work on > the feature. > > Imtiaz > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: "Ethan Jewett" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 5:01 PM > Subject: Re: Branch cleanup > > >> what about the pubsubhubbub branches? can we use any of code from >> these branches? >> >> I don't know how far Imtiaz got or whether we should even support it >> anymore..... >> >> I'm fine with deleting the other ones. >> >> D. >> >> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> .0/ >>> lift-2.2/ >>> metadata/ >>> pubsubhubbub/ >>> pubsubhubbub-2/ >>> update_box_redesign/ > >
